<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=792375415521163&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
2 min read

Episode 7 - Discussions from the front line with Julian Gillespie

Featured Image

In this episode of Discussions from the Frontline Mr Julian Gillespie outlines the current Federal court proceedings. Julian is a lawyer and former barrister, who wrote the legal opinion and prepared the brief for the current AVN Federal Court proceedings, seeking two outcomes. Firstly, that the Secretary of Health perform his statutory duty and suspend or cancel the Covid-19 vaccines and secondly, that the Court rule the decision to extend the vaccines to 5-11 year olds is invalid at law, as the Secretary of Health lacked the legal power to make the decision. 

For more information on the case visit: avn.org.au  and to Donate to their ongoing legal costs please visit: https://givesendgo.com/AVNJudicialReviewFund


In this video series, "Discussions from the Frontline", we are discussing AHPRA overreach and the consequent impacts on Health Professionals, the search for evidence-based best practices and overall public health outcomes.

AMPS and NPAA members have repeatedly raised concerns about government overreach and the negative consequences this is having on healthcare, our professions and the public. 

AMPS understands the cost of questioning government policy and politically correct orthodoxy. Questioning “the science” is tragically now often a career-ending decision, a silencing tactic that works by threatening your livelihood and ability to provide for your family.

We believe highly educated health professionals should be allowed to participate in debates on scientific evidence, treatment protocols and in the public square of ideas without government threats of disciplinary action.